|
In all cases the area-related aims follow - more or less - the
underlying national, regional or city-wide aims. This is obvious due to
the fact that these higher levels set up the legal framework, define the
political strategy for area-related activities and provide both the
funding and the guidelines for all local activities - e.g. the European
URBAN II in Berlin, the Danish Kvaterløft programme in Copenhagen, the
Scottish regeneration programmes in Glasgow, several national laws and
regulations in Lisbon, the Federal regeneration Law in Hamburg and the
Vilnius Old Town Renewal Strategy approved by the state government and
the City Board.
Regional or municipal levels do interpret and transfer these
national frameworks to the regional and local level. This shows clearly
that there are strong interdependencies between these political and
administrative levels.
Local experience has only very little influence on the definition
process at higher levels. Although according to legal regulations in
most of the case studies the implementation at the local level can be
influenced bottom-up through authorised local offices or mediators, the aim(s) definition processes have nearly no experience in employing
bottom-up potentials.
Remaining questions regarding the relation between aims
Are there enough opportunities to integrate local interests and aims,
e.g. from the private sector? Are there sufficient instruments or means
to include local interests into the top-down decision-making to achieve
consensual results and to reflect all interests?
Does the local implementation of the programme lead to a local
empowerment, i.e. growth of local democracy or community consolidation,
and does it correctly and sufficiently reflect the local situation?
Shouldn't the area-related aims be developed at the local level and
then integrated at the higher levels?
|
The hierarchy of aims and the relations between aims at different
spatial and political levels are defined between the national and
municipal levels. But aims (needs and interests) of local stakeholders
and (potential) private partners are reflected in these schemes only if
they coincide with the aims politically and administratively defined.
Area-related aims are not defined independently. |
|