|
Case Studies The Karolinenviertel Case in Hamburg - St. Pauli
INTRODUCTIONARY NOTE
The district of St. Pauli is characterised by different neighbourhoods which are not only distinguished by a different history but also by different needs and problems.
This Case Study is aiming at the analysis of a specific regeneration and redevelopment approach of Hamburg policy on the basis of the German Federal redevelopment legislation. In order to reduce the complexity of the approach as a whole, we will abstain from examining the district St. Pauli as a whole. A meaningful survey would be beyond the scope of this paper.
Instead the neighbourhood Karolinenviertel will be presented on behalf of the entire district of St. Pauli which also has been presented during the ENTRUST cross-visit in Hamburg. In this neighbourhood the change of city regeneration strategies and instruments, the relevant ‘key players’ and partners as well as the role of the private sector and partnerships can be described exemplary.
Introductionary Note
I. Introduction and background – district Karolinenviertel in St. Pauli
1.1. General description of the area
1.2. Historic background
1.3. Distribution of Property
1.4. Description of decline and introduction of the regeneration procedure
1.5. Public infrastructure provision
II. Urban regeneration and redevelopment in the Karolinenviertel
2.1. Instruments of neighbourhood development
2.2. Elements of the regeneration and redevelopment procedure
2.3. Change of the regeneration process
2.4. Visions for the future
2.5. Losers and winners of the regeneration process
2.6. Classification in the city-wide context
III. Protagonists and partners of urban regeneration
3.1. Role of the public partners
3.2. Role of the development agency
3.3. Role of the inhabitants
3.4. Role of private proprietors
3.5. Role of the entrepreneurs
3.6. Partnerships in the Karolinenviertel
3.7. Balance of power within the partnerships
IV. Strategies and structures of the regeneration-process
4.1. Development strategies
4.2. Monitoring and evaluation
4.3. Individual projects
4.4. Financing
4.5. Examples for mixed funding
4.6. Establishment and mainstreaming
|